I've only played Minecraft for a short time. I've noticed that the wood chest usally looks pretty good but the upgrades look like crap. If you use a texture pack other than the default, how do you get these upgrades to look better. Is it up to the designer whether the default looks are used? Is it an HD thing.
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Better Looking Chests
Posted 22 August 2013 - 05:57 AM
Posted 22 August 2013 - 02:01 PM
the upgrades look like crap.
Hope I helped!
Posted 22 August 2013 - 11:53 PM
Image 1 is a generic copper chest. This is from FTB Unleashed using texturepack Westeroscraft. The chest art clashes with the texturepack theme.
Image 2 is from FTB Ultimate using texturepack JSTR. See how these conform to the texturepack theme and look nice.
Why can't I get this in Unleashed? Is it the author of the texturepack that didn't make changes for chest upgrades?
Posted 23 August 2013 - 02:23 AM
It might just be that the author of the texture pack didn't provide compatibility for Iron Chests, forgot or didn't bother to update. You could try palette-swapping a normal chest texture in paint.NET or GIMP if you are so inclined and skilled with image editing programs.
My username is digitallyApocalyptic. I contribute where I can on the wiki and I've previously built pretty much the entirety of Category:Twilight Forest. I play FTB Ultimate, some games on Steam, and I follow MS Paint Adventures.
Posted 26 August 2013 - 02:25 AM
Just open up the JSTR texturepack find the image(s) containing the chest textures, then copy them into the same subdirectory structure in the Westeroscraft pack. You shouldn't need to mess with any image editing programs at all.
- fgendreau likes this
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users