I will probably be adding a captcha system for editing the wiki later today to combat spam. The current anti-spam measures seem to be less effective every day. The captchas will only be enabled for anonymous users. Any thoughts?
Welcome to FTB Forums
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Captchas
Started By
RZR0
, Mar 06 2013 01:24 PM
#1
Posted 06 March 2013 - 01:24 PM
#2
Posted 06 March 2013 - 03:41 PM
Yes, that seems good. Will slow them down if they feel like spamming, and put them off.
-ZL123
Hope I helped!
YT: http://youtube.com/ZL234
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ZL234
#3
Posted 06 March 2013 - 04:23 PM
Is there a way to get it to ip ban them if they reach a predetermined spam cap?
When in Trouble or in Doubt, Run in circles, Scream and Shout!
#4
Posted 06 March 2013 - 05:03 PM
Is there a way to get it to ip ban them if they reach a predetermined spam cap?
There is no automated system. At present we, the moderators and admins, watch Recent Changes for spam posts (and vandalism) and ban as we see fit. We generally ban on the first offence. The current problem are SEO spambots. Captchas aren't meant to discourage human spammers, just the bots we've been dealing with lately. (if you're curious, you can see what we're talking about: http://ftbwiki.org/Special:Log/delete)
- ViperSRT3g likes this
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users